Free Download Nikon Coolpix Hack Raw Programs For Kids
Nikon Patching Help. I use D5100_0101 below as an example, but it's the same for all supported firmware versions: Download the original firmware for your camera model from Nikon Firmware. You are not downloaded the patch firmware from the Nikon Hacker team, we are patching the firmware you download from Nikon. Statistical Techniques Statistical Mechanics.
The Sony a6300 is the company's latest mid-range mirrorless camera. Like the a6000 it still offers 24MP resolution but the autofocus ability, video capability, build quality, viewfinder resolution and price have all been increased. The most exciting change from our perspective is the a6300's new sensor. Although the pixel count remains the same, the a6300's sensor has a whopping 425 phase-detection AF points ranged across the sensor. The a6000 already offered one of the best AF systems in its class, when it comes to identifying and tracking subjects, so an upgrade in this area sounds extremely promising. The sensor is also built using newer fabrication processes that use copper wiring to help improve the sensor's performance and possibly contributing to the camera's slightly improved battery life.
The a6000 has been a huge success and has dominated its field to the extent that its combination of capability and price still looks impressive even as it enters the twilight of its career (Sony says it will live on, alongside the a6300 *). That model represented a dip down-market for the series, with a drop in build quality and spec relative to the NEX-6 that preceded it. The a6300 corrects that course, and sees the model regain the high resolution viewfinder and magnesium-alloy build offered by the older NEX-6 (and the level gauge, which was absent from the a6000). Key features: • 24MP Exmor CMOS sensor • 425 phase detection points to give '4D Focus' Hybrid AF • 4K (UHD) video - 25/24p from full width, 30p from smaller crop • 2.36M-dot OLED finder with 120 fps mode • Dust and moisture resistant magnesium-alloy body • Built-in Wi-Fi with NFC connection option • Built-in microphone socket. As with the previous 6-series E-mount cameras, the a6300 features a flip up/down 16:9 ratio screen.
The shape of this screen hints at the 6300's intended uses: video shooting, as well as stills. The a6300's movie features have been considerably uprated. It not only shoots 4K (UHD) at 24p or 25p from its full sensor width (or 30p from a tighter crop). It also gains a mic socket, the video-focused Picture Profile system (which includes the flat S-Log2 and S-Log3 gamma curves), and the ability to record time code.
This added emphasis on video makes absolute sense, since the camera's stills performance is likely to be competitive with the best on the market but its video capabilities trounce most of its current rivals. The a6300 not only includes focus peaking and zebra stripes but, if its on-sensor phase detection works well, the ability to re-focus as you shoot with minimal risk of focus wobble and hunting, should make it easier to shoot great-looking footage. All this makes it hard to overstate how promising the a6300 looks. A latest-generation sensor can only mean good things for the camera's image quality and an autofocus system that moves beyond the performance of one of our benchmark cameras is an enticing prospect. Add to that excellent, well-supported video specifications, a better viewfinder and weather-sealed build, and it's tempting to start planning for the camera's coronation as King of the APS-C ILCs. Perhaps with only the price tag floating over proceedings, threatening just a little rain on that particular parade. Specifications compared: As well as comparing the a6300 with the a6000 as its predecessor/sister model, we'll also look at what you get if you save up a bit more money and opt for full-frame, rather than APS-C.
We think at least some enthusiast users will find themselves making this decision, so are highlighting the differences. Review History 17 March 2016 Intro, Specs, Body and Handling, Operations and Control and Studio Comparison published 22 March 2016 Updated studio scene images published (inc electronic-shutter and better lens) 31 March 2016 Video and Video Shooting Experience pages added 6 April 2016 Autofocus, Image Quality, Raw Dynamic Range and Conclusion published *Unusually, the manufacturer's claim that it'll live on, alongside its apparent replacement model seems plausible. The differences in spec and price could allow them to sit fairly comfortably alongside one another, rather than the claim simply meaning 'we'll keep saying it's a current model until most of the unsold stock has gone, to avoid angering retailers.' Am really confused between sony a6300 and fuji xt10. I normally do street and documentary photography(where at times i encounter low light and low contrast situation). I use single af points mostly.
I dont care for megapixel and high bust mode. All that i really want is 1) good auto-focus speed and accuracy 2) good image quality raw and good dynamic range 3) good low light performance. And one more thing, in my country,India, somehow the sony a6300(70k) is quite cheaper than fuji xt10(80k). And il be using the kit lens only,as for now.So, what do i choose, plz help? I had the chance to work with an a6300 about two months ago and I'll say that I'm impressed. But there isn't that much difference (at least in terms of IQ) comopared to the a6000 in my opinion. I would have gotten the a6300 in a heartbeat but the one thing that bothers me about the a6000 and a6300 is that there is no second dial on the top (for aperture/shutter speed control) like you have on some of the higher-end DSLRs.
In order to change the focus point, you have to go into the menu and use the little click wheel to adjust, and it just seems clunky, whereas I have a little stickpad on my NIkon that I can just use the arrows and move the single point whereever I want it and not have to go through menus., That and dual memory card slots would be nice (even dual micro-SD card slots). If they employed those two features, I would get one. The only difference i see w/ this one at the a6000 is slight improvement in AF. I don't do video so 4k doesn't matter to me at least. I'm a bit shocked that this got a gold rating given the video overheating issue.
This is a very real issue -- a large number of people get perhaps 10-20 minutes of video and then the camera overheats. The only mention in this whole review was 'we didn't encounter it'.
Fair enough, but the overwhelming data is that this issue is for real. So perhaps the testing was poorly done. I think overheating should have at least been noted on the summary page as a potential issue. And I believe the video rating should have taken a hit for this. The rest of the review is reasonable, just this part seems to me an egregious oversight. They basically only have an exposure compensation dial over the A6300. The rest is just rearranged buttons, generally further away from the right thumb (especially a potential AF-ON button).
And the GX8 is actually down a dial on both. The A7_II body is much more functional, with two extra custom buttons and two extra dials (4 dials total). That said, Sony didn't want to include IBIS on the A6300 because it would have increased the size of the body, so don't expect any large body A6500 in a year or two, even if a potential 2nd gen IBIS can be crammed in. I have to say that in terms of IQ, the A6300 is not a big step up from the NEX-7 body. I bought the A6300 and used it for about a week, shooting a variety of subjects side by side with my NEX 7s, using the same lenses on both cameras. I really wanted to like the new model, but besides the menus being much more accessible and rational, and the quicker autofocus, I thought the ergonomics had actually taken a step backwards. It feels more like a brick than the NEX7 and has a less secure handgrip profile.
It just doesn't feel right to me. In terms of APSC IQ nothing is as good as the Sony APSC sensor and their image processing engine. I tried out the Oly EM1, the Pen-F, the Lumix GX8 and the GX7. There is a lot to like in those cameras: In body stabilization, good ergonomic design of the dials and buttons, nice prime lenses too, but the bottom line is that their image quality is not as good as the Sony's either the NEX7 or the A6000-A6300. Its true the biggest improvement from NEX to a6300 is improved AF-S/AF-C, few usability improvements and 4K, all of these are nice to have's but hard to justify for ~$1000. Anyone that has used NEX for long has already made peace with the old menus and are able to work with it.
So as much as people like to make a deal out of Sony menus, I don't find it a huge improvement, its just different and in both cases you have to learn the menus. On the contrary all those MFT cameras have lot of mid-range features, but the sensor is nowhere near Sony's APSC sensor. Even an NEX camera easily outperforms the latest MFT camera in terms of IQ. I think sony wants too much out of Little cameras.its a great promise.but if you are a profesional, you know you can go great with Nikon, canon, ect gear wich is intended for the purpose, despite de bigger machines. Im an enthusiast photographer, but here in argentina these kind of equipment is really expensive for us.i got a canon powershot sx410is, automatic shotting camera and am very happy, for 1/5 of this sony's price.
I wouldnt be sure wich segment this camera is intended for.not for pros. Neighter for southamerican enthusiast, for sure.i would get such camera provided i had money. But.if i had money to buy such things.i would have even a bit more and get a Nikon FX camera.or a sony A7.full frame! I wouldn't care about portability, because i can bare a small alternative camera for secondary use.i dont really undersand the gap of users to wich this technology is aimed. Almost-but-not profesional use. You mentioned 2 ends of the spectrum - a reasonably priced P&S and a Full frame DSLR/Mirrorless. A Full frame camera and lens requires spending upwards of $2K and results in gear weighing at least a few Kilograms (Canon/Nikon starts at roughly 5KG for the 6D body & 24-105).
The lower end of the spectrum is a P&S which only weighs few grams (roughly. D3300 = a joke. LOL, I have more than 20 camera in my life, and even Olympus E-M1, Canon 6D, 7D = a joke too. Seriously, A6300 is 'almost' perfect. You can't find a perfect camera, you have to give up something in order to get some functions & design. But I like the idea: A6300 + Metabones Speed BOoster + Canon / Sigma / Tamron Lens with AUto Focus or any Legacy Lens adapted to E Mount. ISO Almost high like Full Frame.
11 fps shooting, focus is not like 7D mark II for sure, tracking not fast enough, no touch screen. BUT, i can get Full Frame with metabones plus auto focus, APSC, and the body + weight are so tiny and small. Also, 4k, slow motion at 1080x120. I got one included kit lens for $910 in BH Photovideo. Keep in mind, no camera is perfect, and this little boy is almost perfect. I will sell my Olympus E-M1, E-M10 Mark II, my Canon Body, and keep this A6300. It mixed up my feeling, but I picked one, and I picked A6300 after 3 months used & tested it.
You Pick one on what you need. I had the a6000 for a year, got it with 18-55 and 55-250mm kit lenses for 699.00. Sold it as I was miserable. On paper, the a6000/6300 have great specs and functionality. A compact body, smaller than many m43 but w/aps-c sensor. Why did I hate Sony: 1. Yes, they were 'kit lenses' so i was happy to 'invest' in better ones.
I couldn't find them. I rented a few, including a heavy, expensive 18-105mm, and others. I would have been happy to pay 1000.00 for the Zeiss if it was worth that much 2. In making a compact body, they crammed all the buttons and dials too tightly. I have small hands.
Despite NO TOUCH SCREEN, I found my camera was doing things I didn't expect I was hitting buttons, esp.the directional buttons on the rear dial. I tried all the customizations, finally gave up. I now own a Panny gx8 and find it easier to use.
For me, the placement of the controls is more comfortable, u can use the touchscreen while looking thru the evf. I would like to thank Mr. Butler for spending the time here to address comments. He'd make a good politician. Kids here who get upset that DPR hasn't praised their homework (purchasing decision) as a good mommy (review site) should, and thus conclude that the reviewers MUST be horrible (biased) really need to grow up. Although I would say that I personally value ergonomics over IQ a good deal more than DPR.
Value comparison to the a6000: Maybe I just got lucky, but I bought a package at one of the big NYC outfits a few months back: Body, 16-50 lens, 55-210 lens, Sony accessory pack (screen protector, 2nd battery, external charger), 64GB Class 10 card and a $50 gift card that I recently applied to the Sigma f/1.4 prime. A 3-lens kit and accessories I would have purchased regardless (except for card) and I'm still under $1k all-in with a fast prime? Not sure exactly where that puts the effective cost of the a6000 for me, but it sure is a far sight below $600.
Was is it used? Online it sells for 1k on all main vendors (adrama, b&h, amazon) and and used can't be found under 750$ So consider yourself lucky, I just bought mine from Souq Dubai with 16-50 kit for 900$, the a6500$ 1200$ without kit, it will reach 1.5kb if I add the items you grabbed Sony is just milking the a6000 success with the weird pricing of the trio and fuji is playing along, the x-t20 was priced like the 6300 and significantly higher than the x-t10 (it's actually fujis pricing which led me to the a6300) The 6300 missed a touchscreen but the 6500 touchscreen is meh this is why I skipped it. You should add to the con list that it does not have Active Mode Steadyshot while shooting video. Sony has this on their Handycams and Cybershot models, and it makes the video so, so, so much smoother. This has been bothering me for years! Their VG models have it. Why can't these?
This is such a huge deal to me that I have not been considering Sony mirrorless cameras because of this. They even left it out for the 4K mode on their RX10 III and RX10 II. When I found out about the III, I jumped to find out if they added Active Mode to 4K shooting, but nope. It must be a marketing decision, so if you add it to the con list, maybe they will reconsider. I think Dpreview should take price into account when rating a camera.
The A6300 is no doubt a very fine camera, but taking the price into account it is clear why so many people are much better off buying an entry level DSLR. An entry level DSLR like the D3300 including a kit lens only cost around 1/4 of the price the A6300 body and will provide as good or better image quality and it is not even much bigger or heavier.
Of course you will only get a plastic fantastic camera with the D3300, but what the heck it takes as good images for most purposes. IQ on the D3300 doesn't come close. D500 is the best comparison, where they're neck and neck except for resolution. Size is also significantly different, as well. You can pretty much put 2x A6300s face to face, and another 1/2 stacked on top, to equal the D3300's size. The A6300 is also slightly lighter, despite its full metal body. Then there's the lack of controls, AF ability, video ability, burst ability, tiny, dark viewfinder, etc.
It's clear that these cameras were never meant to compete with each other at any level. Nicelabel Express 5 Keygen Download. Judging from the samples I don't see any significant IQ advantage to the A6300, At higher ISO the A6300 may have a tiny bit less noise than the D3300, but the D500 trumps it easily.
Also I would call the size difference negligible, even though the A6300 body is slimmer and lower (none of them are pocketable with a lens attached): A6300 is 56 grams lighter which is negligible in my opinion. As I said before, most users would be happy to get the same IQ for everyday shots for less than 1/4 of the price and few specialists may prefer the A6300 even with its overheating problems. The question is: which price?
Prices change over time an between territories. The D3300 was launched for $649 with the 18-55mm lens. Do we compare it at that price (in which case your characterisation of the price is a little off), or at an end-of-life, heavily discounted (where you live) price? We do take price into account, but it's the easiest thing in the world to say 'you can get the same IQ from the entry-level model.' That's absolutely true. You can get very similar IQ from the a5100 and a6000, too, but that doesn't mean people should ignore the a6300 and buy those instead.
The a5100 is a touchscreen point-and-shoot, the D3300 is a single dial, inexpensively-built DSLR with a tiny viewfinder. They're great at what they do, but they're a pitiful substitute for those 'specialists' shopping for a sealed, enthusiast-level camera with some of the best autofocus we've seen in a sub $2000 camera and some of the best video, full stop. Yes, I agree that the D3300 was introduced at a much higher price. I also agree that the price may be pretty hard to get into the equation.
I just see it as a sort of problem with prices that are going up and up and that the manufactures are just adding technical features, which may be nice for a very small minority of shooters, and charge a premium for those 'crop sensor' cameras even though the essential parameter, which is image quality including high ISO performance etc. Has almost come to a stand still.
The AF may be fantastic on the A6300, but what about buffer clearing performance?, I think it is a lot less than fantastic. So even when you pay for pro performance you just don't get it. But it's long been the case that you get the same image quality across much of a maker's range: I remember it being true when I was looking at the Canon 350D (Rebel XT) many years ago. It had a very similar sensor to the EOS 30D but was much cheaper (Nikon D50/D70s had the same relationship). However, you got more if you spent more (more controls, better build, faster frame rate) and those were things some people wanted, so both the 350D and 30D sold pretty well to their respective audiences. The same is still true.
Cameras, on the whole, aren't getting much more expensive. The D7200 doesn't offer much in terms of image quality over the D3300, yet costs a lot more. The a6300 is a more sophisticated, better built camera than the a6000, that's why it costs more (the a6000 had some cost-cutting measures, relative to the NEX-6, the a6300 is much more of an NEX-6 replacement). However, $1150 isn't pro money, which is why you don't get pro performance. It's D7200 equiv, not D500.
That's not a fair comparison. If you're going to compare pricing then you should also compare features. Since the D3300 only records HD and not 4K then you should compare that to the Sony a6000 with kit lens. That would be $698, which is $150 more than the D3300.
The wifi is built-in on the Sony and the D3300 requires an adaptor. The Sony has focus peaking. The Sony EVF gets 100% viewfinder coverage. The D3300 gets 95% coverage.
The D3300 also has only a Pentamirror viewfinder. I have a Nikon D810 and the Sony a6300. Both of them serve the purpose perfectly for me. I'm not a mirrorless camera fan per say but I can recognize when Sony's cameras offer better depending on which model Nikon or Canon they are being compared to. For a person that's actually considering this camera, I wouldn't even consider the D3300 (to be honest, that is just ridiculous).
A D500 maybe. You have to consider the camera as a whole.
No one buys a camera solely for image quality. Do you know what's awesome about the A6300? Its AF system, 11 FPS (8 with AF tracking), 4K video.this is why I'm here. I already have a D600 with thousands of dollars of Nikon lenses. I also have a Sony FDR-AX100, so I know how awesome Sony is at video capabilities.
I just borrowed my mother's A6000, and I am surprised by how much I like it. I only wish Sony would add Intelligent Active Mode Steadyshot to their mirrorless cameras. Shooter is probably right, but. After a lot of comparing the D500 and the A6300, I just purchased the latter. Reasons: This review says iq is about the same as the D7200 and the D500 review says it's iq is about the same as D7200.
Makes sense: all three have the same upgraded new generation sensor. The focus in the a6300 will be amazing; the D-500 would probably be a little better. In fact there were a lot of factors favoring the D500 - mainly superb focus, and better lens choices and at better prices; lossless compressed raw, more pleasing jpegs, in camera editing, to name a few.
But one big factor for the A6300: Size. I bought a D750 a year ago with the Tamron f 2.8 24-70; its simply awesome. Great pictures.
But even though the D750 is better, when I go out, I carry my a6000 with Zeiss 16-70 f4. Light, small, unobtrusive. Easy, and pretty quick. I will carry the A6300 everywhere. I would not, the D500. (unknown member) dear folks, I just cancelled an order for an A7R because of the batteries.
I cant get past anyone charging money for a machine that like the 6300 shoots video, very good video, but for only an hour per battery and has no charger for home or car you can charge more batteries with. My thoughts will doubtless be mocked by many, but I can guarantee you will never be happy with a Nex outside the office, on a trip or in the rain, and a touchscreen waterproofedmobile will do 4k for a lot longer, amd unlike your average Nex, wont overheat amd shut down in video draining the baytety like my Nex7 did, yours sincerely, a photographer. Everything is a compromise at this level, size and price point.
Some features are super advanced while the a6300 'cuts' corners with others. The A7rii also costs north of 3 grand. For the a6300, one can easily purchase additional batteries and chargers, if necessary. I would say the line between 'video' cameras and DSLRs has become blurred in recent years. I definitely appreciate battery life, full size connectors and XLRs on 'real' video cameras.
Sometimes the lens selections (or lack thereof), size and cost of video cameras are not great either. Keeponkeepingon, I shoot with an a6000 at dance, sport, and action events. The Buffer doesn't lock up the camera. It does prevent you from making a few small changes. Such as going from spot focus to full screen focus area, or going from af to mf with drive by wire lenses. Though if you're using a lense with mf-af switch you can make the switch. You can pause shooting for a few seconds then click of 15-20 shots right away.
If you don't believe me. I took over 4,000 in less than an hour.
At EMP in Seattle for a BBoy/BGirl dance event. Where you need speed and sharpness. They came out great. Having that smaller camera, with ability to use small drive by wire lense and full frame lense from Sony, Plus adapting to almost any lens out there, High ISO shooting capability, and great sharpness.
You can verify that on DXOMARK. A6300 should be even better for me in low light sport/dance/action shooting. Dan According to imaging resource the A6300 has the same issue locking you out of image preview and many functions after a burst. Dpreview swept this issue under the rug on the A6000 review by not mentioning it in the conclusion, and failed to mention it at all the A6300 review.
'Buffer clearing after max-length bursts took some time even with a fast UHS-I SDHC card, though, ranging between 15 seconds after a max-length burst of RAW files, to a rather lengthy 36 seconds after a max-length burst of Large / Extra Fine JPEGs, and the camera won't let you adjust settings or view just-shot photos while the buffer is clearing'. Hacks are great, but even Canon are now including good intervalometers in their DSLR body firmware.
Sony's system is copying smartphones, which is good in a way, as it could have many developing new apps for the cameras. You pick and choose what functions you want (and will fit in the camera's limited spare memory). You create an account (another one following what you're up to!), connect to their site directly from the camera using Wifi, and download apps, some free, some you pay for. But this comes at a cost, how many functions are going to become optional extras?
The intervalometer was a crucial function for me, and I did not appreciate having to obtain it like this. A6300 easily. IQ blows the doors off the J5 (had it, selling it), and the J5 is noticeably better than the V3. Much better native lens support, too, if you can believe it.;) You'd have to go to legacy support to get more lenses, though the Nikon 1 line's hunger for top notch glass makes it slim pickins unless you have deep pockets.
Tech support, dunno if Nikon's claimed impact damage on any 1s yet.:p And spare parts, you're easily going to be better off with the A6300, as it's already selling well. V3's been out for a while, but it's pretty niche. I owned a full Nikon 1 kit and now have a mostly complete kit for the a6000.
With the 1 system I think bulk and weight are the primary driver so that should be a big factor. The 1 system bodies have been a big disappointment and what led me to dump the system. Enthusiasts want control and the Nikon 1 bodies just don't play nice.
Nowhere near enough physical controls. Integrated viewfinder is NOT an option. I can't afford $10k USD for such a system so the cost lenses is often as big an issue as the availability. I found the offerings for both sufficient. The Nikon was a true gem in build quality.
It felt like the future of cameras. The Sony (and Sigma lenses) are good enough. I don't use technical support or parts.
If you mean quality I haven't had a problem with either. The Sony system is excellent overall, with great DOF potential with the f/1.4 prime, especially given the size and weight.
Nikon will always cripple the 1 to avoid cannibalization.
Longtime DPReview community member and forum moderator Horshack has created a free desktop application designed to help Nikon users wirelessly transfer files from their cameras to their computers - something not provided by any Nikon program. Compatible with OS X, Windows and Linux, Airnef is an open-source utility that works with Nikon's external Wi-Fi adapters and cameras with Wi-Fi built in. The program can be used with Canon cameras as well, but the app is designed with Nikon shooters in mind. The demo video above shows Airnef in action, as well as the options it provides for the handling of files selected for transfer.
Images can be selected for transfer in-camera the same way you'd proceed if you were sending images to a smartphone. Once the camera's Wi-Fi network has been activated and the computer connected to it, Airnef will handle the download process. Airnef can recognize and automatically skip any images that have been previously transferred, and users can choose to download files based on file type, date captured, by specific folder or from a particular media card slot. Visit to download the program. * Update (): v1.1 has been released and now adds support for Sony cameras.
Well, here's a good reason Nikon falls further and further behind. They don't want pros to use WIFI for some irrational reason. Sure, pay them massive amounts of money for an old technology (Their WIFI is woefully outdated.) And ignore the competition. Canon at least has put gigabit ethernet (with a full-sized plug no less) in the D1X years ago. That's what I'm using at work now. I've sold off almost all of my Nikons because it's become clear they have no interest in being contemporary and they have no desire to make the best cameras they can. My work cameras are Canon, and my personal cameras instead of Nikon are now Olympus.
Try to compete with the size, weight and capabilities of the OMD E-M5 Mark II. The only thing Nikon has going for it are Sony sensors. And Olympus is about to get a 20 mp sensor in their next pro camera. And I'm going to be all over it, with the equivalent of 14mm-300mm 2.8 in three lenses and one quarter the weight. I've checked every security package and the only one I've found that flags my site is bitdefender.
I've submitted a false-positive support ticket to them and received an auto-responder message saying the site will be removed from their blacklist within 72 hours once they confirm it's a false-positive. Symbian Os Pips Download. I'm guessing my site is being flagged because of the unsigned downloadable executables it contains (Airnef included).
Here's a site that aggregates URL-based checks from the various security providers. From: 'WS.Reputation.1 is a detection for files that have a low reputation score based on analyzing data from Symantec’s community of users and therefore are likely to be security risks.
Detections of this type are based on Symantec’s reputation-based security technology. Because this detection is based on a reputation score, it does not represent a specific class of threat like adware or spyware, but instead applies to all threat categories.' I saw the same thing when I first released rawshack, my raw file analysis utility. I resolved it then by submitting the executable to Norton for inclusion on their whitelist. Looks like I'll have to do the same for Airnef. It's a shame I'm spending my entire morning submitting tickets to security vendors. Would rather be spending my time working on new features for Airnef:(.
Wow, this is amazing news. Many thanks to the developer! It is also a mystery to me why Nikon have never released a program for anything other than mobile devices.
Once the auto download of new files function is enabled I'll set it up so that files are downloaded as soon as the camera is within range of my computer at home. Then put the kettle on, make a cup of tea and voila!, the first of the day's images are on my system ready to be edited:) I'd imagine Thom Hogan will be pleased by this possibility too. I see from the notes on the developer's website that it took reverse engineering to make this work. Come on Nikon, either release an SDK or develop the app yourself.
Users require this sort of usability - all you will do with time with this sort of closed attitude is drive people to Canon, Fuji or Sony. I tried to connect my J5 to my Mac but gave up after about an hour. The Mac connects to the J5 but the J5 says 'Waiting for WiFi connection' and just hangs there. When I click on Start Download I keep getting the message: 'airnef v1.00 - Wireless transfer of images/movies for Nikon cameras [GPL v3] Copyright (c) TestCams.com, App Launch Time: Fri Sep 18 09: Connection established to 192.168.2.1:15740 Camera Command Failed: MTP_OP_OpenSession, Error: MTP_RESP_InvalidParameter'.
I think I will just stick to the cable from camera to Mac routine. Nice idea though.
A lot of hard work has gone into the project so best of luck for other cameras. Nikon put the Wi-Fi hardware and put a PTP/IP responder (the transfer firmware) in the cameras in the first place, then shipped a free software development kit letting any developer take advantage of those transfer features without having to deal with the low-level details. I fail to see what Nikon has to 'learn' from this, except that their vision found one application.
That said, 2MB/s is not a practical speed, it's about 100x slower than a fast UHS-II memory card on a fast USB 3 reader.